scribe_protra: (Default)
scribe_protra ([personal profile] scribe_protra) wrote2011-02-06 09:43 pm
Entry tags:

Round 2 is closed.

The meme is being moved over to here http://dresden-kink.dreamwidth.org/

This round is now closed.

(frozen comment) Re: Oy! No breaking rule number 2.

(Anonymous) 2011-02-18 10:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Rule #2 only really works when you only get annoyed by things you can fairly easily expect to find a rule against, but I've never seen an LJ comm with a rule against duplicate comments. And goodness knows people posting fics make duplicate comments everywhere. It's also helpful if you add things to the rules once you've realized that they annoy you.

Plus, personally, I'm more than twice as likely to look into a recommendation when two people come up with it independently. Do you really want to prevent things like that? People make mistakes. Sometimes those mistakes are good.

(frozen comment) Re: Oy! No breaking rule number 2.

(Anonymous) 2011-02-18 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay, now you're not just annoying the mod, you're annoying everyone. No one give a shit, dude, and no one wants to read duplicate recs. Dresden fandom is fucking tiny half of us have read everything already and see recs as discouraging fills. Also, no one fucking cares.

(frozen comment) Re: Oy! No breaking rule number 2.

(Anonymous) 2011-02-19 12:02 am (UTC)(link)
addendum: If you actually cared, you would have pm'd the mod. Since you left it in a comment thread, I'm going to assume you just wanted to start shit, and I regret playing into that.

(frozen comment) DA

(Anonymous) 2011-02-19 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
And by everyone, you mean you.

Chill out, people. The reduntant rec took a split second to read and dismiss; the ensuing argument is a waste of everyone's time and brings negative energy to the kink meme.

(frozen comment) Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2011-02-19 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
I agree so fucking much with this comment. Please. People. Chiiiill.

(frozen comment) Re: Oy! No breaking rule number 2.

(Anonymous) 2011-02-19 03:21 am (UTC)(link)
You sound a lot like you care! And why don't you get shirty with people who have long meta discussions or get all "seconded", "thirded", "fourtheded"-y in comment threads?

This fandom is like a zillionty times bigger than a lot of fandoms out there, c'mon.

(frozen comment) Emmy!

(Anonymous) 2011-02-19 03:24 am (UTC)(link)
This wank is boring and crusty. I would like a new one, please. :( In b4 no1curr.

(frozen comment) Re: Oy! No breaking rule number 2.

(Anonymous) 2011-02-19 03:53 am (UTC)(link)
See previous: If you actually gave a damn, you would have pm'ed the mod instead of starting shit in the comments. This is a kink meme; if you're going to wank, at least have the courtesy to fic it.

(frozen comment) Re: Oy! No breaking rule number 2.

(Anonymous) 2011-02-19 04:27 am (UTC)(link)
if you're going to wank, at least have the courtesy to fic it.

This should be a rule.

(frozen comment) Re: Oy! No breaking rule number 2.

(Anonymous) 2011-02-19 06:34 am (UTC)(link)
No input on the rule two thing, but as the first reccer anon, I'm sorry if I was discouraging fills! Multiple fills are a thing of awesomeness, and this prompt deserves a good new fic to call its own. I only brought this rec up because it was a) really close to specifications and b) a tv-verse Harry/Bob that I suspected was somewhat outside of the scope of a lot of people on the meme.

/tl;dr.